« Home | Four Federal By-Elections On Monday » | Phony Conservative MP 'Hates Taxes' Yet Takes His ... » | Senator Mike Duffy IS A Fake Parliamentarian » | Minister Responsible For Policing In Saskatchewan ... » | Saskatoon Star Phoenix SLAMS Government Minister F... » | Federal Government Knows That GlazoSmithKline Are ... » | The VISITORS - Buckdog's Ongoing Coverage Of The R... » | Auditor General Says 'Public Safety Canada Is A Di... » | Buckdog's Ongoing Coverage Of The Royal Tour Of Pr... » | If We Let Harper Put The Conservative Logo On EACH... » 

Sunday, November 08, 2009 

Harper's New Speechwriter Is A Strong Social Conservative And Gay Rights Opponent

The following article was written by Jenn Ruddy, a Saskatchewan writer/journalist. Her articles appear in The Sasquatch, Briarpatch, Prairie Dog and Planet S:

Progressive Bloggers

It probably won’t come as much of a shock that the Prime Minister’s Office has hired a gay rights opponent to write speeches for Stephen Harper.

Former Calgary Herald columnist Nigel Hannaford is the latest — but certainly not the first, and probably not the last — social conservative to join the upper echelons of Harper’s government.

Hannaford, who was a member of the Calgary Herald’s editorial board until recently, has argued against gay rights in his column Slings & Arrows and scoffed at the legitimacy of human rights commissions. He once referred to human rights tribunals as “communist show trials, not courts” and implied that human rights advocates are “whiners.”

If you think that’s bad, here’s what he had to say about gay rights:

Referring to former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau’s 1969 decision to decriminalize homosexuality, Hannaford wrote in 2005, “Fine, said lots of people. Leave gays alone? Fair enough. But, let ’em be Boy Scout leaders? Have each other’s benefits? Adopt kids? Marry each other? Ridiculous. Anybody seeking political office who suggested it would have been laughed off the hustings. Yet, the Liberals are ready to legalize gay marriage. How did we get to this point?”

Of the 1998 Delwin Vriend Supreme Court ruling, which required that Alberta add sexual orientation to its human rights legislation, Hannaford wrote in 2003, “So much for democracy.”

And when Elsie Wayne, former deputy leader of the Progressive Conservative Party, was excoriated for saying in 2003 that gays should “shut up” about marriage and that Canadians shouldn’t have to “tolerate” gay pride parades, Hannaford wrote in her defence: “Wayne gets my vote. ... Canadian society has been turned upside down in the past 35 years and things regarded as sin in 1965 have special status in 2003.”

As recently, as his May 8, 2009 column, Harper’s new speechwriter lamented that Section 3 of Alberta’s Human Rights Act makes it difficult to prevent Albertans from bringing the same kind of “creepy curriculum” to the province that B.C. has allowed, “in which gay advocates design class material promoting their persuasion right down to kindergarten.”

Hannaford’s appointment troubles longtime gay activist and former Edmonton city councillor Michael Phair.

“Much of what Mr. Hannaford writes and has indicated in his work as a journalist, I suspect, reflects Prime Minister Harper’s and his party’s position on what they would like for Canadian society to be, and I think it harks back to a 1950s approach,” says Phair.

He worries that the Harper government will continue to look for back-door ways to reduce equality for the queer and other marginalized communities, as well as women.

Hannaford’s hiring is the latest in a string of appointments that place social conservatives in high-ranking positions of the Harper government. In July 2008, one of Canada’s most prominent Christian conservatives, Darrel Reid, was appointed director of policy for the Prime Minister’s Office and later moved to one of the top political posts in the country when he was promoted to deputy chief of staff in February.

Another Christian evangelical, Paul Wilson, replaced Reid as director of policy.

NDP critic for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transsexual and Transgender Issues Bill Siksay says he’s not surprised to learn of Hannaford’s appointment.

“We know that there’s still — within the Conservative Party and within the Conservative caucus — lots of folks who don’t support the full human rights of gay and lesbian Canadians, who are not friends of the queer community, and so in a sense it’s not surprising,” says Siksay.

Some of those folks Siksay refers to within the Conservative caucus can be found right here in Saskatchewan.

In July, Saskatoon-Humboldt Conservative MP Brad Trost was critical of his government’s decision to fund Toronto’s gay pride week and pandered to anti-gay sentiment. Speaking to the right-wing website LifeSiteNews.com, Trost reassured the pro-life community, “The tourism funding money that went to the gay pride parade in Toronto was not government policy, was not supported by — I think it’s safe to say by a large majority — of the MPs.”

Shortly thereafter, Saskatoon-Wanuskewin Conservative MP Maurice Vellacott wrote a letter to his constituents supporting Trost’s comments and reassured them that their tax dollars would be used for more “suitable purposes.”

In 2003, the then MP for Regina-Lumsden-Lake Centre Larry Spencer was suspended from the Canadian Alliance caucus for saying that homosexuality is a conspiracy theory to seduce and recruit young boys. Spencer said he would support any initiative to criminalize homosexuality.

And who could forget the media scandal last year in which Regina-Lumsden-Lake Centre Conservative MP Tom Lukiwski was caught on videotape saying in 1991: “There’s A’s and there’s B’s. The A’s are guys like me, the B’s are homosexual faggots with dirt under their fingernails that transmit diseases.”

“There is a very one-sided message coming from the Conservative Party,” says Nathan Seckinger, executive director of the GBLUR Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity in Regina. “What we hear are a lot of anti-queer statements being made by individual politicians under a conservative banner. What we don’t hear are any pro-queer statements.”

Still, while Seckinger says Hannaford’s appointment is “more of the same,” he cautions against playing partisan politics.

When it comes to queer policy issues, he says, none of the political parties is adequately addressing the severity of homophobia and transphobia in Canada or Saskatchewan.

Just how severe is it? Statistics Canada revealed in 2004 that gays and lesbians are nearly twice as likely to be the victim of a violent crime, including sexual assault, robbery and physical assault, and bisexuals are four-and-a-half times as likely, compared to heterosexuals.

In 2007, 10 per cent of police-reported hate crimes in Canada were motivated by sexual orientation.

“What we’re really talking about is a sin of omission,” says Seckinger. “The concern for me isn’t so much the fact that Conservatives are shooting their mouths off about having anti-queer positions, because politicians say dumb things once in a while. My concern is more that they say them frequently and that they don’t have anybody saying anything else [about queer issues], and that’s what tells me that there’s a problem.”

When the Lukiwski scandal broke out last year, GBLUR, under the leadership of Seckinger, took the high road: it accepted Lukiwski’s apology and called for co-operation across political divides. GBLUR’s goal was to shift the debate toward the health and safety crisis facing queer people in Canada and away from the media’s sensationalized coverage of the scandal.

“The reality of it is that Mr. Lukiwski had been campaigning against same-sex marriage for years and nobody gave a damn,” says Seckinger. “The reason everybody got angry about that issue is because he used a dirty word. He got caught on tape using the word ‘faggot’ and it got put on TV and so, really, what people were upset about wasn’t the fact that the man is homophobic, because that should have been common knowledge already. What people were concerned about is the fact that he was being impolite about his homophobia.”

Seckinger says there’s no doubt that the Conservative Party panders to homophobic voting bases. But when the media lend coverage to, say, Harper’s new homophobic speechwriter or to the blatantly homophobic remarks of an individual politician, the pressing health and safety concerns of the queer community get ignored.

And the general homophobic discourse in government, which cuts across party lines, sneaks under the radar.

“A question to ask yourself is, ‘how often do queer specific concerns get put forward in the form of bills?’” says Seckinger. “The mental health problems for the GLBT community are epidemic in Canada. Why is that not being dealt with? Even the left-wing parties aren’t talking about that.”

Jenn Ruddy

This article was published in:
-Planet S
-Prairie Dog (no link)

These attitudes are why GLBT support/health/advocacy groups need better funding. Name another marginalized group who has been so thoroughly ignored by every level of government. It's a shame. We puff out our chests when we compare ourselves to what we perceive as lesser democracies yet Canada remains an incredibly homophobic nation. Just ask anyone who has to survive it on a daily basis.

Funding for queer health initiatives was never very good when the Saskatchewan NDP was in power, though to their credit they did establish annual core funding for Gay & Lesbian Health Services (Now Avenue Community Centre) in Saskatoon but it is still a pittance in comparison to how other similar marginalized communities are funded. Under Harper the funding has almost completely dried up, especially if the organization dares to do advocacy or conduct social marketing campaigns. Another organization that does advocacy and social marketing, Canadian Rainbow Health, has had no funding at all from the Harperites and survives with one 1/3 time staffer now who is paid entirely through donations, and they are no longer enough. Governments both federal and provincial are starving queer organizations until they die. Give Harper a majority and the cause of queer civil rights will be set back twenty-five years or more.

I'm one queer who has had enough, but not everyone dares to speak. As long as homophobia exerts such a powerful influence we'll remain largely voiceless, largely invisible save for an annual parade here and there. Our only true security is total visibility, hard to do when the fear of coming out is so strong for so many of my brothers and sisters.


Given the iron-lung lock of the IgHar coalition, does this mean that they have now decided to remove the mask and begin governing like they already have that majority?


I wouldn't hold my breath for the immediate future.

-The good news is that the majority of Canadians don't agree with Harper Inc. on equal rights for Gay persons.
-The bad news is that the Conservatives will routinely continue to quietly advance their regressive agenda on Canadians. They will continue to do that until they are removed.
-The really bad news is that we will likely endure a moderately lengthy period of Conservative minority government for awhile yet.

How many Conservatives watch Rick Mercer?
Timothy Findlay's partner wrote for years the Nature of Things programs
These Cons might be quite shocked to know how many gays are working in government and media..
And what about all those young hockey players who were molested?

I work with gays, my relatives are gays, so believe me I am not homophobic! My challenge is that after 13 years of Liberal rhetoric, we cannot even have a conversation about --get this-- the high risk life-style of gay/lesbian relationships. Today, 77% of diagnosed AIDS is still within the Male Gay population. Perhaps you won't agree with me, but I think presenting and normalizing the "gay life-style" in both elementary and high school is irresponsible. I love my gay nephews, but they are not sending an informed message about their lifestyle and posts like yours are adding to the confusion.

Anybody who thinks the Tories don't constantly pander to their redneck base hasn't been paying attention. Good news is (at least to some extent) that they haven't moved to criminalize Gay marriage or a woman's right to choose. These two issues are too important to them politically to really do anything about them.

If they did, what would they use to secure the votes of gun-toting religious wing nuts in the next election? After all, those groups have been voting for the Tories based on promises made but never kept for several terms now, and why throw out a perfectly good hook by doing what you promised?

So, let's see...what's left for Harper to run on, if not their two pet issues? Certainly not his fiscal record, or his success in Afghanistan...maybe then he would have to rely on his vocal talents...a cross-Canada musical "tribute" tour...

More and more, politics is simply showbiz...the Liberals have a leader that looks like Herman Munster and sounds like a tenured varsity prof...the kind that students tune out. Harper is easier to look at, as long as you don't pay attention to what he says or does. And people today are much more interested in the latest "reality" show than in reality.

Post a Comment

Follow leftdog on Twitter

About Me


  • -Carmichael-
  • Things I Read

    • -Canadian Political Viewpoints-
    • -ZAG-
    • -Next Year Country-
    • -Huffington Post: Canada-
    • -Let Freedom Rain-
    • -Informed On Information-
    • -Wellington Post-NDP-
    • -Trapped In A Whirlpool-
    • -Larry Hubich's Blog-
    • -ROGERISM-
    • -Leftdog's Daily KOS Blog Page-
    • -Dipper Chick
    • -Ideagist -
    • -Al Barger's MORETHINGS.COM-
    • -Canadian Cynic-
    • Saskatchewan Progressive Bloggers
    • My Zimbio
      Top Stories
    • Blogarama - The Blog Directory
    • Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites
      View blog authority
    • Display Pagerank
    • Canada's NDP
Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates