Fundamentalists Create 'Conservapedia' Because Wikipedia Is Too Lefty - Liberal
"Apparently Wikipedia is far too liberal for the fundies, so they created an alternative. It's called Conservapedia, and on the front page, it explains why it was created. The site boasts that Wikipedia is liberally biased, so presumably, the editors created this site, which is in no way, shape or form biased, even though it's called "Conservapedia."
Conservapedia
tag wikipedia
Conservapedia has got it right. Wikipedia has a lefty bias, just like reality does.
We definitely need an alternative. I wonder who's going to moderate Conservapedia, and what "guidelines" are for contributions.
PS: Do you think Jason Cherniak is conservative enough to be able to contribute? I checked; they don't have a contribution for "anti-semitic" yet. Since he's the self-proclaimed expert on everything Jewish, he'll probably make a great contribution!
Posted by Erik | 4:24 pm, March 11, 2007
Colbert said it best:
"...guys like us, we don't pay attention to the polls. We know that polls are just a collection of statistics that reflect what people are thinking in 'reality.' And reality has a well-known liberal bias."
Posted by PolarDan | 6:55 pm, March 11, 2007
Danier, that is a brilliant quote! Thanks! ...
Posted by leftdog | 7:14 pm, March 11, 2007
I rather enjoy the Uncyclopedia.
Not a darn thing to do with reality but it sure is funny.
Posted by Not Your Mama | 11:30 pm, March 11, 2007
I like the bit in their rules where they privilege American spellings.
Posted by Dan | 12:10 am, March 12, 2007